Guides · Method
Comparing AI glasses without falling for marketing.
Nits, megapixels, field of view – spec sheets love to dazzle. The framework for a fair comparison in three steps.
The 3-step framework.
- 1
Category before score
Display glasses, camera glasses or AR headset? “Ranking” devices across categories is dishonest – they solve different problems. Fix the purpose first, then compare.
- 2
Everyday values before lab values
Weight under ~50 g, battery in days not hours, prescription integration, control without the phone in hand – that decides daily wear. A 4K camera is useless in a drawer.
- 3
Follow-up costs and ecosystem
Subscription duties, app lock-in, language support, warranty path: the label price is not the three-year price.
Example: the framework applied.
| Criterion | Even G2 (display/AI) | Ray-Ban Meta (camera/audio) |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Information in view | Capture & audio |
| Everyday weight | 35 g – like normal glasses | n/a |
| Battery rhythm | Days + charging case | n/a |
| Prescription | UltraFit, display-optimised | Rx lenses |
| Follow-up costs | None, no subscription | Features tied to Meta account |
| Meeting-proof? | Yes, no camera | Situational – camera visible |
Full data of all models with sources: in the database. We are the authorised Even Realities partner and state this openly.
Compare with your own eyes.
A spec sheet never shows how 35 grams feel.